The One Rule That Separates Great Investors From Everyone Else
- Kevin Follonier

- Jul 8
- 4 min read

In this episode of When Shift Happens, I sit down with Haseeb Qureshi, Managing Partner at Dragonfly, to discuss one of the most misunderstood ideas in investing. A former professional poker player turned venture capitalist, Haseeb has lived through some of crypto's darkest moments. He witnessed the collapse of the ICO boom in 2018, the devastation following FTX, and countless periods when confidence in the industry seemed beyond repair. Yet through each cycle, his philosophy remained consistent.
We discuss the evolution of exponential technologies, why conviction is so rare, and why history rewards those who can tolerate uncertainty longer than everyone else.
Every Industry Loses Its Pioneers
One of the conversation's most interesting insights had nothing to do with markets. Many people have noticed veteran figures leaving crypto and interpreted it as a sign that the industry is running out of steam. Haseeb sees something entirely different.
"The pioneers and the settlers are always different," he explains.
The people who thrive in the earliest stages of an industry are rarely the same people who scale it into maturity, just like the first employees at a startup aren't usually the ones running a thousand-person organisation years later. The explorers who cross unknown territory eventually make way for builders who construct cities. Crypto is simply reaching that stage. Rather than signalling decline, experienced founders moving on may actually be evidence that the industry is growing up.
Why Most People Never Experience Exponential Returns
One of Haseeb's strongest arguments is also the simplest. Looking back over crypto's history, the biggest fortunes weren't necessarily made by people who perfectly timed every cycle. They were made by people who stayed invested long enough for the technology to mature.
"So many people I know came into crypto at the same time that I did who didn't make money," he says. "How is that possible? ... You just didn't do the obvious thing, which is stay in the market."
That sounds almost too simple until you consider what "staying" actually requires. It means living through crashes that wipe out years of gains, watching respected investors abandon positions you still believe in, and questioning whether your original thesis was ever right in the first place.
Markets rarely test your intelligence. They test your conviction.
Believing In The Exponential
Perhaps the central idea of the entire conversation is what Haseeb calls "believing in the exponential." When he entered venture capital in early 2018, crypto was collapsing. Prices were falling relentlessly, public sentiment had turned hostile, and many people concluded the industry had simply been a collective delusion. In hindsight, today's success stories make survival during that period seem obvious, but it wasn't.
As Haseeb puts it, "You have to ask yourself, why do I actually believe this? Because everything is moving against me. The entire universe is conspiring to say you're an idiot." Those moments are where conviction is truly tested. If your belief depends on positive headlines or rising prices, it probably isn't conviction at all.
Real conviction comes from understanding that transformational technologies don’t grow in straight lines. They spend years appearing insignificant before suddenly becoming impossible to ignore. The difficult part is recognising which temporary setbacks are simply the price of participating in exponential change.
Poker Taught Him How To Think
Long before venture capital, Haseeb played professional poker, and that experience fundamentally shaped how he approaches investing. In poker, even the world's best player loses individual hands, so winning doesn’t depend on making every decision work out immediately. Instead, it’s about consistently following a strategy with positive long-term expected value.
Investing works the same way.
Trying to perfectly buy every bottom and sell every top is an impossible game. Instead, the objective is to build a strategy that continues producing good outcomes over many years, even if individual decisions occasionally disappoint. Too many investors evaluate decisions based on outcomes, while great investors evaluate them based on process.
Technology Adoption Is Always Slower Than People Expect
Another recurring theme was Haseeb's tendency to compare crypto with previous technological revolutions. He argues that understanding blockchain requires understanding how technology spreads through society, one generation at a time.
Older institutions often resist unfamiliar technologies until leadership falls to younger generations who grew up with entirely different assumptions about the world. He points to Bitcoin, cloud computing, artificial intelligence, and countless previous innovations as examples of the same pattern. Eventually, what once seemed controversial becomes ordinary.
When describing Bitcoin's eventual maturity, he says, "Bitcoin is very boring." Young people won't see it as revolutionary because it will simply be part of everyday financial life, much like the internet has become today.
Long-Term Greed Beats Short-Term Greed
Haseeb rejects the idea that wanting to make money is somehow incompatible with building meaningful technology. People are naturally motivated by self-interest, but the problem lies in extractive mentalities.
He draws a distinction between chasing quick profits and what he calls being "long-term greedy." Long-term greed means making decisions that maximise trust, reputation, and value creation over decades rather than weeks.
Sometimes that means sacrificing immediate gains, but in the long run, those sacrifices often become your greatest competitive advantage. It's a philosophy that explains why the best founders continue building through bear markets while others disappear as soon as prices fall.
Conviction Is Lonely
Throughout the conversation, one message kept resurfacing: believing early is uncomfortable. Whether discussing Ethereum, Solana, or crypto more broadly, defending fundamental principles is deeply unpopular because markets tend to swing between the extremes of optimism and pessimism.
This dynamic isn’t unique to crypto; every transformative technology follows a similar path where it is misunderstood at first, tested by scepticism, and repeatedly written off before becoming foundational. The investors who ultimately benefit aren’t those who perfectly time every turn, but those who build conviction strong enough to endure uncertainty and stick with a strategy that works over the long run.
👉If you enjoyed reading the summary, head over to When Shift Happens on YouTube or your favorite podcast platform to access the full convo.


Comments